New university pre-opening guided check
Eight plain-language prompts to organise evidence and unresolved conditions before the next approval gate.
Open guided companion
SPECS resource library
Use our editable workbooks to structure internal discussion, organise evidence and identify priorities. Read SPECS Insights without registration.
Open access · About five minutes
Start with seven plain-language questions, evidence examples and up to three suggested actions. Answers stay in your browser; download your summary or print it as a PDF. No sign-up required.
Start the guided self-checkOpen access · Browser-local
No sign-up. Work stays in the page and clears on refresh or closing. Download a summary before leaving.
Eight plain-language prompts to organise evidence and unresolved conditions before the next approval gate.
Open guided companionSeven themes for a focused board conversation. Expand each theme to read all 20 original workbook questions.
Open guided companionBuild a small, traceable register of up to five evidence items and their improvement actions. No questionnaire score.
Open guided companionVerified downloads
Each workbook is free for internal institutional use. Submit professional details and confirm your email address to release the selected file.
Test whether an institution has retained meaningful human accountability before AI influences marks, feedback or progression-related decisions.
Academic leaders, quality teams, assessment boards and responsible-AI governance groupsView and request workbookTake an initial, structured view of accreditation evidence, identify areas requiring attention and prepare a focused readiness conversation.
University leaders, quality teams and accreditation coordinatorsView and request workbookStructure governing-body discussion about academic quality, student outcomes, institutional evidence, risk and improvement.
Governing bodies, councils, trustees and senior leadership teamsView and request workbookCreate a traceable record connecting institutional evidence, review findings, accountable actions and verified closure.
Quality offices, review teams, programme leaders and evidence ownersView and request workbookCoordinate the regulatory, academic, operational, staffing, facilities and launch requirements that must align before student recruitment and delivery begin.
University sponsors, boards, project directors and pre-opening teamsView and request workbookOpen access
Concise, evidence-led perspectives for university leaders, quality professionals and educators.
View all articlesStart a conversation
Tell us the review, risk or improvement priority you are working through. A senior SPECS consultant will help you define a useful first step.